Unless your lecturer or supervisor has specified otherwise, it’s safe to assume that you’re being asked to complete a narrative literature review. These are the most common type used in assignments and research projects.
It’s worth noting that narrative reviews using systematic methods are becoming more popular. These follow a structured approach to searching and selecting literature, similar to a systematic review. If you're planning to take this more formal route, the Systematic Review Guide will be more relevant, particularly in terms of the support the Library can offer around systematic searching.
A narrative literature review typically forms part of a broader research project. They provide a descriptive summary of existing research on a specific topic. It offers a broad overview by highlighting key themes, theories and trends, typically organised thematically or chronologically. A well-written narrative review identifies gaps in the existing literature and explains why the research that follows is necessary, highlighting how it contributes to the ongoing scholarly conversation in that area. This type of review focuses on qualitative assessment rather than quantitative analysis.
Unlike systematic reviews, narrative literature reviews do not necessarily adhere to a standardised search methodology and can vary in length, comprehensiveness, and timeframe. They generally allow flexibility in the choice of resources and search engines; you are more likely to be able to use tools like Library Search, federated databases (which search across multiple platforms, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest), and grey literature (e.g. policy documents, reports, and other non-commercial publications).
Useful for | Limitations |
---|---|
|
|