Skip to Main Content

Measuring Research Impact: Atikara Hautaka | Journal Articles

A guide to measuring the impact of your research

Measuring the impact of articles

While there are many forms of research output across most disciplines journal articles remain the most common form of research output, and often the default for measuring research impact.  Article-level metrics provide a snapshot of how an individual article is being discussed, shared, and used. Metrics can be drawn from many different places and can be traditional, citation-based metrics, or other measures and metrics such as altmetrics.

If an article has a DOI (Digital Object Identifier), tracking its impact across various platforms will be easier. If you cite an article then using a DOI in that citation will help others track the impact of the research.

Resources for measuring impact

Many publishers and databases have their metrics platforms and ways of measuring article-level impact, but these often only capture citations within their own database.  

Larger, cross-disciplinary indexes from which citation counts can be accessed include Google Scholar, Dimensions, and Scopus.

Scopus and SciVal also provide a Field Weighted Citation Index (FWCI) which compares the citations an article has to articles published in the same year, the same type of article (i.e. review articles are compared with other review articles), and with other articles in the same discipline.   

There are many other ways of measuring article impact. One of these is citations in Policy Documents. Overton is a database that captures where articles have been mentioned or cited in policy documents from Government entities, Intergovernmental Organisations, Think Tanks:  

Almetrics, or alternative metrics, capture where research has been used, mentioned or cited outside of academic research. Note: Almetrics scores often include traditional citations as part of their calculations, but they also include much more. PlumX metrics, which can be accessed in Scopus, produces a visualisation based on 5 categories - Usage (e.g. clicks, downloads, views, library holdings), Captures (e.g. bookmarks, code forks, favourites, watchers), Mentions (e.g. blog posts, reviews, news media), Social Media (e.g. shares, likes, comments on platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Figshare) as well as Citations (both traditional academic citations and policy and clinical citations). Similar data can be viewed through the Altmetric Bookmarklet or via the free version of Dimensions (which requires registration to access).

Need Help?

Need Help?

For assistance, reach out to the Open Research Team at library@waikato.ac.nz.